“A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops gathered from several nations, will fight against the true Christ, the only Savior of the world. He will shed much blood and will want to annihilate the worship of God to make himself be looked upon as a God." Our Lady Of La Salette
Our Lady at La Salette said that there will be a forerunner to the Antichrist, who will raise an army of men from many Nations. Our Lady at Fatima said that a group of soldiers will one day kill the Fatima Pope, this group of soldiers belong to the army of the Forerunner to the Antichrist and the forerunner's name is Gary.....
So with the incredible confusion surrounding the now-concluded Synod, self-styled Catholic conservatives are piling on Pope Francis, scoring points and being hailed as brave and courageous for taking on the Pope.
It's a cheap way to score points. Have things accelerated under Pope Francis in a negative trajectory? Sure. But the Catholic media and blogs, comprised almost entirely of concerned Catholics without a shred of professional secular experience, were almost silent as the problem was developing before Francis.
We and others have rightfully pointed out the heresy, heterodoxy and dissent among very key players here at the Synod, placed in their roles by Pope Francis. But a very important historical question is being overlooked here: How did they rise to the levels that Pope Francis could appoint them to these posts in the first place? Let's go down a quick overview of some of the more troublesome prelates:
Cardinal Baldisseri was consecrated bishop by John Paul and placed on the powerful congregation for bishops by Pope Benedict.
Homosexualist Bruno Forte was made archbishop by John Paul in 2004 and personally laid hands on by then Cdl. Ratzinger, one of only 26 men ever made bishop by him.
Homosexualist Donald Wuerl was made bishop by John Paul and created a cardinal by Pope Benedict in 2010.
New Zealand's John Dew was made cardinal by Pope Francis, true — but he was consecrated a bishop by John Paul.
Women-deacon-supporter Canadian Paul-Andre Durocher was made bishop by John Paul II in 1997 and made archbishop by Benedict in 2011.
Essentially heretical Cdl. Marx was made bishop by John Paul in 1996, and it was Pope Benedict who placed him the position to become this troublesome by making him cardinal in 2010.
John Paul made Walter Kasper both bishop in 1989 and cardinal in 2001 — this after then Cdl. Ratzinger had already publicly crossed swords with him over the whole "Holy Communion for divorced and remarried" question, which Kapser had already been rambling on about for 30 years.
Exceedingly liberal Charles Palmer-Buckle, the only African to talk openly in favor of the Communion question, was made bishop and archbishop by John Paul.
Another exceedingly liberal African, Peter Turkson, was made bishop and archbishop by Pope John Paul.
Cardinal Oswald Gracias of India, a Pope Francis favorite, was made a cardinal by Pope Benedict.
Brisbane Australia's archbishop Mark Coleridge was raised to his high place as archbishop by Pope Benedict.
And all kinds of troublesome prelates — Roger Mahoney, homosexualist Joseph Bernardin, sex-abuse covering-up Cdl. Danneels, Theodore McCarrick — were all made cardinals by Pope St. John Paul.
And the list of prelates who trouble Catholic media types has one more name on it made cardinal by John Paul: Jorge Bergoglio.
During all these appointments by John Paul, one of his most intimate advisers was then Cdl. Joseph Ratzinger, hailed as a hero by many in the "conservative" crowd. Once he became Pope, he continued a string of very questionable and troublesome appointments. While he did appoint some good guys, as Pope Francis has, he has enough bad guys on his roll to raise some serious questions — including some of the big names at this Synod, like Baldisseri, homosexualist Forte, Wuerl and Marx, who owe their current prestige directly to Pope Benedict.
And lest anyone think this is attacking the Pope, Joseph Ratzinger isn't the Pope anymore.
And this is a question that has been completely overlooked during all the hand-wringing going on here at the Synod, in all the analysis and reporting in the Catholic media world. The whole reason we are here in October of 2015 is because of what Pope Benedict did in February of 2013: He resigned, abdicated, abandoned the office of Pope — a monumental action, not yet fully recognized for the enormous earthquake it caused in the Church.
Forget for a moment all the rumors that it was done for blackmail or financial threats or whatever; we may never know. What’s important is he did it. He surrendered to whatever forces he thought he could not resist. The Holy Father abandoned his flock, and it was that single action that has brought all this about. Francis may have lit a fuse here, but Pope Benedict laid the dynamite. He has now set in motion a series of events that the Church may take decades, or even perhaps, God forbid, centuries to recover from without the much-longed for and prayed for direct heavenly intervention.
For the past eight years, ChurchMilitant.com has been calling out the problem of these bishops and many others. Our new book Militant spells much of it out in detail. Yet many of the Catholic blogs and websites — some of whom actually told us privately to not to do that — are now more than happy to strut around damning Francis and the Synod while ignoring the real underlying cause of this chaos.
Pope Benedict's fingerprints are all over this Synod. Many of these troubling characters were put into their places by him personally and others indirectly. When everyone in the Catholic blogs and websites is calling on "clarity" from Pope Francis, where are the appeals from these same websites for Pope Benedict to say something? Surely, of all people, you would think he is disturbed and troubled at heart at all this madness — madness propagated by his men anointed at his own hand. Shouldn't he be issuing a public statement regarding heresies? He resigned because of health reasons, but going on three years later, his health seems just fine.
Contrast that to Pope John Paul, who actually had a health issue — recall that scene where, struggling mightily with Parkinson's, he issued his last blessing from the window of the Apostolic Palace shortly before his death, setting an example beyond words. When Pope Benedict was elected he said publicly, "Pray for me that I do not flee for fears of the wolves" — yet that is exactly what he did. He turned around and ran away, abandoning the flock to wolves he had let in the sheepfold.
Believe me, it's not that ChurchMilitant.com doesn't see the problems with this pontificate — but we think there's enough blame to go around that all guilty parties should be exposed, not just scoring cheap clickbait points by piling on. The reality is that whatever comes out of this Synod, many of these malformed, evil, wicked clerics are simply going to return to their dioceses or high offices and keep doing what they've been doing for years, even decades, trying to crush the authentic Faith. The Synod was an attempt to institutionalize it and make it official.
What Benedict's resignation has done is fundamentally change the papacy. It has caused a cataclysm far greater than what has followed in the wake of the Second Vatican Council. You barely hear a reference to Vatican II here at all. It's all about Pope Francis. Immediately following the Council, liberals and progressives spoke in terms of the Church as if She hadn't existed before 1965. Today, they speak in even more narrow terms: as if She'd never existed before Pope Francis. Even John Paul's 1980 heralded exhortation on the family, Familiaris Consortio, has been essentially pushed aside.
The damage of Benedict’s resignation is now coming into full focus. The Church has been reduced in the common mind to just the Pope — nothing else. What Pope Benedict did may even rise to the level of immoral. Recall that there is the history of St. Peter running out of Rome when Nero fired up the persecution. Suddenly on the Via Appia Our Blessed Lord appeared to him walking toward Rome, and Peter said to Him, Quo Vadis, Domine? "Where are you going, Lord?" And Jesus answered, "I'm going to Rome to be crucified again."
Peter got the message and turned back around, went into Rome and was martyred. That is precisely what Benedict did not do. And because of it, he has introduced an element into the papacy that may never be capable of being overcome except by another direct intervention by Our Lord. Ironically, Pope Benedict is the one who invented the term the "hermeneutic of continuity" versus the "hermeneutic of rupture" — yet he is the very one who has introduced this rupture and its resulting confusion into the papacy.
In an era where fatherhood has become so disgraced, Pope Benedict is the one who will be remembered as abandoning his children in the hour of their great need. This is the kind of analysis that Catholics need to hear, not just hand-wringing and piling on Pope Francis.
Gary is building himself up as a leader of Roman Catholic men. Gary has not yet claimed to be the Great Monarch but he constantly hints at it.
Another one that actual claims to be the Great Monarch is Eric Gajewski of TradCatKnight
Eric is a fraud:
Eric buys all his views to fool many into thinking that his site is very popular. I was fooled to some extent and I wondered why posts on his blog on Catholic spirituality etc would generate so many views. Granted he had crazy stuff like Planet X and there are many crazy people out there who like reading that crazy stuff - but why would these same crazy people read anything on Catholic spirituality or morals etc? They wouldn't. So I wondered why I didn't get the same or similar traffic on all my posts on Meditation on the Sunday Gospels or on the Passion of Our Lord and Savior. Now I know why. Eric is exposed as a fraud in the above video.
At the 32.50 mark Eric is exposed as publicly manifesting himself as the Great Monarch. This is why Monarchy is dangerous - very dangerous. Any deluded fool can claim to have royal blood and many do Eric is one of them.
No Roman Catholic in is right mind should ever cling to Monarchy as a means to restore all things in Christ. Many pretenders will arise just like Eric and claim to be this or that, when in fact they are not.
The forerunner to the Antichrist will do the same - claiming to be of Royal blood etc.
Is Eric the forerunner to the Antichrist? No, probably not. The above video should effectively shut his fraudulent operation down.
The forerunner to the Antichrist will raise an army of men from many nations who will one day kill the Fatima Pope and faithful. This army will be real - it will not be a fake Internet Army created by some hit farm in Bangladesh.
So Eric is done.
Gary Voris is still the best contender to be the actual forerunner to the Antichrist.
All frauds love Monarchy because anyone can claim to have royal blood. Don't get sucked in by the Royal blood frauds.
As for the Divinely Ordained Authority of the Holy Roman Emperor can never be a fraud or will ever deceive because that man has to be elected by the Seven Imperial Electors. And the Seven Imperial Electors are called Proclaimers of Divine Providence who will one day elect a man chosen by the Blessed Trinity.
Again Monarchist are a danger to the restoration of all things in Christ and most monarchists will be found in the camp of the forerunner to the Antichrist.
There is evil here in Rome, evil being orchestrated by sons of Satan Gary Voris>>>>>>
“A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops gathered from several nations, will fight against the true Christ, the only Saviour of the world. He will shed much blood and will want to annihilate the worship of God to make himself be looked upon as a God. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
Gary the forerunner to the Antichrist is calling others the offspring of the Devil before anyone calls Gary the offspring of the Devil.
I guess if you're the first to call others names that means that no one is allow to call you by the same!!! LOL!
Gary the forerunner to the Antichrist has called these Prelates the offspring of the Devil wearing the robes of Judas:
Cdl. Lorenzo Baldisseri,
Abp. Bruno Forte,
Cdl. Donald Wuerl,
Cdl. Daneels,
Cdl. John Dew,
Abp. Paul Andre Durocher,
Fr. Thomas Rosica
That's just a partial list of who Gary considers sons of Satan.
The thing is, is that Gary himself defends the wicked actions and heretical doctrine of Pope Francis...but so do the men listed above......
One thing to notice is that the Devil is always first. It is a tool of Satan to be the first in order to fool the unwary - for instance if a wicked soul accuses some innocent soul of some crime you can be sure that the wicked soul is the one that committed the crime - its call projection. It happens more than you think - women are very good at this wicked game.
Enter Voris or Gary the forerunner to the Antichrist as I like to call him.
He publishes a book about his life so that everyone can soak up his lies, he will claim to be a saint in youth but turns into a great sinner in his later life and converts back to the faith by the prayers of his mother, and now Voris is the Great Saint sent from on high to save the Church and the World.
Voris, in case none of you are catching on, is claiming that he is the Great Monarch to save us all!
So any criticism leveled at the Great man will be considered in bad taste.
However...there is one small problem with Gary projecting himself as the Great Monarch.....Gary defends the wicked actions of Pope Francis.
There is no other proof needed than the fact that Gary defends Heretical Pope Francis - this is evidence enough that Gary is not the Great Monarch.
On the contrary Gary is the forerunner to the Antichrist spoken of by Our Lady at La Salette & Fatima.
List of reasons that Gary is the best candidate to be Forerunner to the Antichrist:
1. Defends wicked actions & heretical doctrine of Pope Francis
2. Claims that the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary has been done.
3. Claims that JPII is the Fatima Pope who is murdered in the Secret of Fatima.
4. Goes by his middle name Michael to sound more Catholic
5. Refuses to go by Gary......
6. Attacks the SSPX
7. Hair like a woman (Apoc. reference)
Will add to the list....
Question: Is Gary born of a Incubus? Sound ridiculous? Yea..I know you would rather believe that Voris might be the Great Monarch born in exile.....whatever..
Did you know that the Arch Heretic Martin Luther was born of Incubus?
Here:
There are, that write Luther to have been born of an Incubus (that is of a filthy spirit abusing women in place of man) which oppressed his mother, when she was a servant in a common bath in Germany: but I know not of what credit it is: the credit dependeth of that matron of lypsta, which reported it, and knew well his mother. Prateolus
Are Incubus real? Yes of course. St Augustine said that to deny such is heresy.
It is said that the Antichrist will be born by an incubus - Our Lady said that the Antichrist will be born of a false Virgin. Meaning that a Incubus will impregnate the false virgin
Succubus gets the sperm from a man and the Incubus plants the seed into the woman.
One question can be asked from what man was the seed taken from in order to impregnate Luther's mother?
Think about this for a moment - who is wicked enough to be the father of Martin Luther? I'm sure the seed was not just ordinary seed from some farmer. No, the seed that the devil implanted into Luther's mother had to come from a wicked man, a very wicked man.
I do know that the seed of man breaks down over time and the Incubus does not have much time in planting the seed into some women. At least that's what the opinion was back in the day.
But today we have a way of preserving sperm:
Yea those sperm banks have it all covered:
Sperm can be frozen indefinitely. There have been normal pregnancies from sperm stored frozen for 12 years. The efficacy of the freezing is questionable when it has been frozen for more than 12 years. Each individual's sperm reacts differently to the freezing process. Jul 9, 2014
So if modern man can preserve sperm for 12 years or indefinitely, then I would think that Evil Spirits can preserve sperm for a longer period. Meaning the the seed that gave birth to Martin Luther was probably seed from Judas himself! That's 1,450 year old sperm!
Same goes for the Antichrist - the seed that gives birth to the Antichrist will probably be from Judas as well.
Same goes for the Forerunner to the Antichrist Gary. If Gary is the forerunner to the Antichrist then Gary is the offspring of Judas!
Yea I know you don't want to believe such things.....but again you will believe that Gary is the long awaited Great Monarch...LOL!
