Friday, March 11, 2016

GOOD SEMINARIES TEACH AQUINAS? Really? But Gary Ignores St Thomas On The Habitat Of Demons & The 29,050ft Boundary That Men Must Not Pass Over


Snippet of Gary on the Summa of St Thomas. Problem with Gary is that he is a fraud. Gary ignores St. Thomas, and yet Gary claims that he reads, studies and promotes the Summa.

If Gary truly studied St Thomas then Gary would know about the 29,050 boundary that men are not allowed to pass over. 

Gary would know about this 29,050 ft boundary that men must not pass over by reading

Question 74. The fire of the final conflagration.

Gary would learn that  this 29,050 ft or 15 cubits above the mountain tops is a boundary established by the Blessed Trinity and that men must not pass over because:
  • This boundary is the level that the smoke of Pagan sacrifices reached. 
  • This is the level that the waters of the deluged reached in order to cleanse the world of sin. 
  • This is the level that the tower of babel reached before being knocked over by the Finger of God. 
  • This is the level that the fire of the final conflagration will reached in order to burn up all the works of men both holy and profane at the end of days
But modern men pass over this boundary everyday 24/7 with commercial and space travel. Gary himself violates this boundary every time he jet sets to his next engagement.

If Gary truly believed in the words of the Summa then Gary would think twice about violated the 29,050 ft boundary established by the Blessed Trinity.

But Gary ignores this part of the Summa and thinks that St. Thomas was mistaken on Question 74.

The funny thing is - is that there is a price to pay when men violate this boundary by traveling by airplane:


When flying above this boundary, you place yourself closer to the habitat of the Demons. Again another teaching of St Thomas that is ignored by Gary. The funny thing is yet to come........

Now for St Thomas on the Demons of the Darksome Atmosphere:

Summa Th. I EN Qu.64 a.4
Article: 4 Whether our atmosphere is the demons' place of punishment?

Objection: 

1. It would seem that this atmosphere is not the demons' place of punishment. For a demon is a spiritual nature. But a spiritual nature is not affected by place. Therefore there is no place of punishment for demons.

2. Further, man's sin is not graver than the demons'. But man's place of punishment is hell. Much more, therefore, is it the demons' place of punishment; and consequently not the darksome atmosphere.

3. Further, the demons are punished with the pain of fire. But there is no fire in the darksome atmosphere. Therefore the darksome atmosphere is not the place of punishment for the demons.

On the contrary Augustine says (Gn ad lit. iii, 10), that "the darksome atmosphere is as a prison to the demons until the judgment day."

I answer that The angels in their own nature stand midway between God and men. Now the order of Divine providence so disposes, that it procures the welfare of the inferior orders through the superior. But man's welfare is disposed by Divine providence in two ways: first of all, directly, when a man is brought unto good and withheld from evil; and this is fittingly done through the good angels. In another way, indirectly, as when anyone assailed is exercised by fighting against opposition. It was fitting for this procuring of man's welfare to be brought about through the wicked spirits, lest they should cease to be of service in the natural order. Consequently a twofold place of punishment is due to the demons: one, by reason of their sin, and this is hell; and another, in order that they may tempt men, and thus the darksome atmosphere is their due place of punishment. Now the procuring of men's salvation is prolonged even to the judgment day: consequently, the ministry of the angels and wrestling with demons endure until then. Hence until then the good angels are sent to us here; and the demons are in this dark atmosphere for our trial: although some of them are even now in hell, to torment those whom they have led astray; just as some of the good angels are with the holy souls in heaven. But after the judgment day all the wicked, both men and angels, will be in hell, and the good in heaven.

Reply to Objection:

1. A place is not penal to angel or soul as if affecting the nature by changing it, but as affecting the will by saddening it: because the angel or the soul apprehends that it is in a place not agreeable to its will.

2. One soul is not set over another in the order of nature, as the demons are over men in the order of nature; consequently there is no parallel.

3. Some have maintained that the pain of sense for demons and souls is postponed until the judgment day: and that the beatitude of the saints is likewise postponed until the judgment day. But this is erroneous, and contrary to the teaching of the Apostle (2Co 5,1): "If our earthly house of this habitation be dissolved, we have a house in heaven." Others, again, while not admitting the same of souls, admit it as to demons. But it is better to say that the same judgment is passed upon wicked souls and wicked angels, even as on good souls and good angels.

Consequently, it must be said that, although a heavenly place belongs to the glory of the angels, yet their glory is not lessened by their coming to us, for they consider that place to be their own; in the same way as we say that the bishop's honor is not lessened while he is not actually sitting on his throne. In like manner it must be said, that although the demons are not actually bound within the fire of hell while they are in this dark atmosphere, nevertheless their punishment is none the less; because they know that such confinement is their due. Hence it is said in a gloss upon Jc 3,6: "They carry fire of hell with them wherever they go." Nor is this contrary to what is said (Lc 8,31), "They besought the Lord not to cast them into the abyss"; for they asked for this, deeming it to be a punishment for them to be cast out of a place where they could injure men. Hence it is stated, "They [Vulg. 'He'] besought Him that He would not expel them [Vulg. 'him'] out of the country" (Mc 5,10).



Sunday, March 6, 2016

More Evil Portents For Gary & Crew Retreat At Sea: Texas Man, David Mossman, Falls Overboard From A Royal Caribbean Cruise Ship Off The Coast Of Florida And Vanishes

Saturday, April 2 - Saturday, April 9, 2016: Round trip from Los Angeles to San Francisco, Santa Barbara, San Diego and Ensenada, Mexico. Read More>>>>>>>>>
Update the doom for Gary & his retreat cruise.



Now for the latest news of cruise ship mishaps:
Texas man, 46, falls overboard from a Royal Caribbean cruise ship off the coast of Florida and vanishes  
The Coast Guard is searching for a Texas man who fell from a Royal Caribbean cruise ship off the coast of Key Largo, Florida. Coast Guard officials say 46-year-old David Mossman fell from the 10th deck of the Navigator of the Seas ship late last night, a distance of about 100 feet. The events leading up to Mossman going overboard have not been revealed. David Mossman reportedly fell from a stateroom balcony, a witness told the Inquisitr. Daily Mail Read More>>>>


Monday, February 22, 2016

Pope Francis Is the ANTICHRIST! So Says Crazy Evangelical Nut Job & New Hampshire Sate Rep Susan DeLemus LOL!


"The Pope is the anti-Christ. Do your research," 

"I'm not sure who the Pope truly has in his heart."

"I was actually referencing the papacy. And what I wrote after that 'do your research,' if you read the Geneva Bible, which is the Bible I use when we study, the commentary is—actually by the founders of the United States actually, the Protestant Church—their commentary references the papacy as the anti-Christ," DeLemus said. "And I think actually in one part of it, and I don't remember who it was that wrote it, there was one of the popes that they had referenced as the anti-Christ. So that's all I was referring to, the papacy, not particularly that one particular pope because the papacy is a seat. It's not just one person."   Politico Read More>>>>>


"I'm not saying the pope is going to start growing horns and a tail and start poking people."


"I'm not Catholic so I don't think he's infallible. I believe he's fallible just like the rest of us," DeLemus said. "I'm really not a respecter of men. It's really God I respect, and he's the head and the leader." Politico Read More>>>>>

DeLemus added that she didn't think it was "fair for the pope, or anyone else for that matter, to judge whether anyone else is Christian or not. Some people who have accepted Christ believe they're Christian and then they fall away. Or they never had salvation or they do have it. That's not really our business. For me, I love Jesus Christ. I believe he is the son of God. I love God and I believe I am a saved sinner. That's who I am. And that's how I try to live my life. And as you can see I'm completely fallible and human and make mistakes as we all do."  Politico Read More>>>>>




Friday, February 19, 2016

LOL! Gary & Crew At Church Militant.com On Contraception VERSUS Pope Francis On Zika Contraception!!!!

ZIKA VIRUS

POPE FRANCIS APPROVES OF CONTRACEPTION:

Paloma García Ovejero, Cadena COPE (Spain): Holy Father, for several weeks there’s been a lot of concern in many Latin American countries but also in Europe regarding the Zika virus. The greatest risk would be for pregnant women. There is anguish. Some authorities have proposed abortion, or else to avoiding pregnancy. As regards avoiding pregnancy, on this issue, can the Church take into consideration the concept of “the lesser of two evils?”

Pope Francis: Abortion is not the lesser of two evils. It is a crime. It is to throw someone out in order to save another. That’s what the Mafia does. It is a crime, an absolute evil. On the ‘lesser evil,’ avoiding pregnancy, we are speaking in terms of the conflict between the fifth and sixth commandment. Paul VI, a great man, in a difficult situation in Africa, permitted nuns to use contraceptives in cases of rape.

Don’t confuse the evil of avoiding pregnancy by itself, with abortion. Abortion is not a theological problem, it is a human problem, it is a medical problem. You kill one person to save another, in the best case scenario. Or to live comfortably, no? It’s against the Hippocratic oaths doctors must take. It is an evil in and of itself, but it is not a religious evil in the beginning, no, it’s a human evil. Then obviously, as with every human evil, each killing is condemned.

On the other hand, avoiding pregnancy is not an absolute evil. In certain cases, as in this one, such as the one I mentioned of Blessed Paul VI, it was clear. I would also urge doctors to do their utmost to find vaccines against these two mosquitoes that carry this disease. This needs to be worked on. Rorate Caeli Read More>>>>>>>

GARY VORIS AND CREW AT CHURCH MILITANT.COM DISAPRROVE OF CONTRACEPTION!!

Contraception Fuels Lust for Pleasure

The Politics of Contraception

Ted Cruz Into Contraception

The Download: Contraception in Canada

Philippines Under Fire for Cutting Funds for Contraception

It's All About Contraception | The Vortex

Obama to Spend $1.8 Billion on Zika Research, Contraception

Myth: Contraception Is Needed to Curb Overpopulation

Contraception and Sanctification | Basic Training

Salesian Missions Promote Masturbation, Contraception

Catholic Physician Stops Prescribing Contraception, Faces Backlash

CIA: Contraception

.......and so on.......