Visiting Babylon

SERMONS ON ANTICHRIST FOR ADVENT: In What Manner Will Antichriſt Appear? How Will He Attain Sovereign Power? And Where Will He Be Resident?

3. POINT 

In What Manner Will Antichriſt Appear? How Will He Attain Sovereign Power? And Where Will He Be Resident?

ACCORDING TO S. Hierome, his beginning will be from Babylon. His coming, saith Daniel the Prophet, will be secret, and by fraud will he obtain his Kingdom. For according S. Hierome, S. Cyril, and S. Damafien, he will be a most hypocritical sycophant, and dissembler, entering by mildness,& justice, & suddenly what by such encroaching, what by witchcraft wherein he will excel, he will usurp any universal monarchy, as a dreadful monster said to issue out of the sea, because of his sudden appearance in royal authority. 

To which do belong the words of St. Paul: whose coming is according to the operation of Satan, in all power, and lying 2.Theſ.2.v.6. signs, & wonders, & in all seducing of iniquity to them that perish for that they have not received the charity of truth that they might be saved. 

Another mean of his sudden authority will be his infinite treasure. For as the Prophet saith ; He will have dominion over the treasures of gold, and silver and in all precious things of Ægipt. To whom, ſaith S. Anselm, will all hidden treasures be brought by Satan then let at liberty, whom no such secrets will escape. Also all principal fends will be attending on him, and his affairs, outwardly in shape of men, soliciting, bribing, in forcing men to obey him, & inwardly suggesting by futile delusions all that they may allure. Who when they cannot persuade by such means: by torments, by diseases, & hook & crook they will subject whole multitudes to his dominion. 

Also a powerful motive to yield unto him, will be his forsaid lying signs, & wonders, but much more his unlimited might, whereby he will subdue, and trample in a trice all that will oppose themselves. So faith St. John, And power, Was given to him upon every Tribe, and people, and tongue, and nation. 

More over his coming in all seducing of iniquity, by abominable doctrine,and all example, will draw infinite followers of licentious life to submit themselves to him; the rather that preaching, and other exercises of Religion will be abolished, and all that may entice to wickedness will be plentiful, & in those days all sin will be allowable, and laudable. 

As for his seat of residence is commonly supposed it will be in Jerusalem: where he will first restore the temple, and after exalt himself above all that is called God, as after shall be shewed. 

Principally his tyranny will be over and against the Roman Empire, and all parts thereof, although all other places will hardly escape him. Would God poor Ireland might have some privilege, or exemption from his fury in those times, by being never any parcel of the said Empire, and being particularly prayed for to that effect, by our most glorious Apostle St. Patrick, as in many appeareth. 

Babylon: A History of the City

 

ACCORDING TO S. Hierome, his (the Antichrist) beginning will be from Babylon.

How Many FSSP Rad Trads Are Fighting For Putin In The Ukraine? They Need Practice In Killing In Order To Hunt Down And Kill Priests And Religious.....

Priests and religious orders will be hunted down, and made to die a cruel death.  Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879) 

Confirmed that there are Americans fighting for the Ukraine - some have lost their lives.

FSSP'ers defending Putin fail to show up on the battlefield?

What gives?

I thought FSSP'ers were manly man he man warriors with lots of guns and ammo?

I thought FSSP'ers loved to shoot and kill?

I thought FSSP'ers loved to carry guns with them to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass?

Maybe a few FSSPers from Austria made it to the Ukraine  to help Putin murder Ukrainian woman and children?

Don't laugh - the Forerunner to the Antichrist and his murderous sycophant followers need practice in killing in order to one day hunt down and murder priests and religious as Our Lady has Foretold

Putin's hooligan army: Football ultras 'are recruited to fight as paratroopers' as Zelensky vows to have killed 100,000 Russian troops and 'God knows how many mercenaries' by 2023 

A desperate Vladimir Putin is conscripting football hooligans into his army to fight in Ukraine after suffering devastating losses on the battlefield. Notorious thugs have been mobilised into the ranks of the 106th Airborne Division based in the city of Tula, 125 miles south of Moscow, where FC Tula Arsenal plays. Footage shows the new recruits training for battle with local media reporting they have been drawn from the ranks of football 'ultras'. The news emerged as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky predicted that Russia will have seen 100,000 of its soldiers and 'God knows how many mercenaries' killed by the year's end.Speaking overnight, Zelensky said heavy fighting continues in Donetsk - particularly around the town of Bakhmut - where 'hundreds' of Russians are killed each day. 'We are defending and, most importantly, we do not allow the enemy to carry out their intentions,' he said. 'They said that they would capture Donetsk - in the spring, summer, autumn. This week, winter is already starting.' He added: 'This year, Russia will lose a hundred thousand of its soldiers killed and only God knows how many mercenaries. And Ukraine will stand. 'The world will do everything to ensure that everyone who is guilty of this criminal war is brought to justice.' Ukraine claims that Russia has already seen around 89,000 troops killed in a little over nine months of war, with around 450 more being killed each day. However, this figure has not been independently verified and Western estimates of Russian losses have been lower. Mark Milley, chief of the American general staff, said earlier this month that Russia has likely seen 'over 100,000 soldiers killed and wounded' in Ukraine - without giving a separate figure for deaths. Source

ARCHBISHOP VIGANO IS THE TWO FACE NAPOLEON:

LA SALETTE PROPHECY ON TWO FACE NAPOLEON:

“May the curate of my Son, Pope Pius IX never leave Rome again after 1859; may he, however, be steadfast and noble, may he fight with the weapons of faith and love. I will be at his side. May he be on his guard against Napoleon: he is two-faced, and when he wishes to make himself Pope as well as Emperor, God will soon draw back from him. He is the master-mind who, always wanting to ascend further, will fall on the sword he wished to use to force his people to be raised up. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879) 

BARON ALEXANDER VON TSCHUGGUEL IS THE FORERUNNER TO THE ANTICHRIST:

LA SALETTE PROPHECY ON FORERUNNER TO ANTICHRIST

"A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops drawn from many nations, will wage war against the true Christ, sole Savior of the world; he will shed much blood and will seek to annihilate the cult of God so as to be regarded as a god." Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

MARIE JULIE JAHENNY  PROPHECY ON FSSP RAD TRADS:

"During the time of the approach of the punishments announced at La Salette,an unlimited amount of false revelations will arise from hell like a swarm of flies; a last attempt of Satan to choke and destroy the belief in the true revelations by false ones." Marie Julie Jahenny of La Faudais (d.1891)

PROPHECY OF MELANIE ON TWO POPES: 

"I didn't see, I don't see any Great Pope or Great Monarch before an extremely great tribulation, horrifying, terrible and general for all Christendom. But before that time, twice there will be a short lived peace; TWO shaky, servile, doubtful popes" Mélanie

THIRTY FIVE YEARS OF CHASTISEMENTS 

God will abandon mankind to itself and will send punishments which will follow one after the other for more than thirty-five years. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

LA SALETTE + FATIMA TIMELINE 

1. Two Popes. (13 March 2013)

2. Manifestation of the Forerunner to the Antichrist (21 October 2019)

3. Death of Two Popes (_ _ / _ _ / 2022)

4. NIGHT ILLUMINED BY UNKNOWN LIGHT DURING NEW MOON (_ _ / _ _ / 2022)

5. Start of Thirty Five Years Worth of Chastisements (_ _ / _ _ / 2022)

6. Rise of the Political Power of the Forerunner to the Antichrist (_ _ / _ _ / _ _ _ _)

7. Creation of Forerunner's Nationalist Army (_ _ / _ _ / _ _ _ _)

8. Persecution of the Catholic Church by the Forerunner and His Nationalist Army(_ _ / _ _ / _ _ _ _)

9. Murder of Fatima Pope & Faithful on top a Steep Mountain by Forerunner and his Army.

10. The Rise of the Great Monarch & Great Pontiff (near the end of the 35 year Chastisement)

11. The death of the Forerunner to the Antichrist.

REMEMBER - THE 35+ YEARS WORTH OF CHASTISEMENTS DO NOT START UNTIL THE TWO POPES ARE DEAD...... 

“The great chastisement will come, because men will not be converted; yet it is only their conversion that can hinder these scourges. God will begin to strike men by inflicting lighter punishments in order to open their eyes; then He will stop, or may repeat His former warnings to give place for repentance. But sinners will not avail themselves of these opportunities; He will, in consequence, send more severe castigations, anxious to move sinners to repentance, but all in vain. Finally, the obduracy of sinners shall draw upon their heads the greatest and most terrible calamities. Mélanie

“We are all guilty! Penance is not done, and sin increases daily. Those who should come forward to do good are retained by fear. Evil is great. A moderate punishment serves only to irritate the spirits, because they view all things with human eyes. God could work a miracle to convert and change the aspect of the earth without chastisement. God will work a miracle; it will be a stroke of His mercy; but after the wicked shall have inebriated themselves with blood, the scourge shall arrive Mélanie

“What countries shall be preserved from such calamities? Where shall we go for refuge? I, in my turn, shall ask, What is the country that observes the commandments of God? What country is not influenced by human fear where the interest of the Church and the glory of God are at stake? (Ah, indeed! What country, what nation upon earth?) In behalf of my Superior and myself, I have often asked myself where we could go for refuge, had we the means for the journey and for our subsistence, on condition that no person were to know it? But I renounce these useless thoughts. We are very guilty! In consequence of this, it is necessary that a very great and terrible scourge should come to revive our faith, and to restore to us our very reason, which we have almost entirely lost. Mélanie

MARIA OF THE CROSS,

Victim of Jesus nee MELANIE CALVAT,

Shepherdess of La Salette

"I protest highly against a different text, which people may dare publish after my death. I protest once more against the very false statements of all those who dare say and write First that I embroidered the Secret; second, against those who state that the Queen Mother did not say to transmit the Secret to all her people." Mélanie

Sermons On Antichrist For Advent: Who Is Antichrist, Or How Long Will Be His Dominion, According To The Opinion Of Certain Ancient Doctors?

2. POINT. 

Who is Antichrist, or how long will be his Dominion, according to the opinion of certain ancient Doctors? 

OF Catholics you may find in Pererius upon the Apocalypse, divers (as Annius of viterb, Henthenius, Clitoueus, Prateolus , Genebrard) affirming or insinuating Mahomet to be Antichrist. 

S. Hypolitus imagined that Antichrist will be begotten by the Devil upon a public harlot. S. Augustin relates of others thinking Nero to have been Antichrist. The common opinion de Ciuit.c.19. of ancient Doctors is, that Antichrist will be that abomination of desolation which Christ foretold should sit in the temple. In which opinion are S. Ireneus, Hierome, Hilarius, Ambrose, &c. 

The ancient Doctors do also resolve, that he will be a Jew, and of the Tribe of Dan: for which cause they imagine that S. John numbed nor that Tribe among the residue Apoc. 7. Also, even by confession of  Whitaker, and Fox, they taught that he should be but one man, and not continue but three years and a half, The fathers for the most part taught, that Antichrist should be but one man. Almost all the holy and learned Interpreters d by a time, times, and half a time, understand only three years and a half. 

So that I need not allege their citations, their consent being so openly acknowledged. To whom by decrees do consent certain of the less malicious Protestants, as Zanchius before named, that the rage of Antichrist will not surpass three years and a half. Marie, Fox (whom Forde, and Downham, follow) led by a willing spirit, sine voce tamen, yet without any speech, resolved to stretch these three years & a half to 294. years; notwithstanding all the Holy learned interpreters judged otherwise. But the express scriptures precisely & diversely specifying this time of Antichrist by three years and a half, by 42. months, and by 1260. days, we may lawfully distrust these Foxes, not only in such their name prefiguring Heretics (according to the exposition of S, Augustin, and S. Ambrose) but also in practice schematically departing from the acknowledged consenting opinion of the Fathers, how soever they impudently beare in hand some time universally to agree with their belief. 

As for his being of the tribe of Dan, saith Luther: vulgata opinio est apud omnes firiptores Ecclefiafticos quod ex Tribu Dan Luth.ad c.49. venturus fit Antichrijtus. It is a received opinion among all Ecclesiastical writers, that Antichrist will be out of the tribe of Dan. In ſaying then the Pope to be Antichrist, who is of nor such Tribe, nor otherwise Jew: is it not insolent presumption, seeing that the Pope is so wrongfully reproached, and all Ecclesiastical writers so disdainfully contradicted? 

What Tribe or nation soever he shall be, S. Paul expressly warns us, that we be not terrified, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by Epistle, for his coming before the revolt; that is the suppressing of the Roman Empire, and Emperor both for Imperial power & name. which not being hitherto done, as all the world may witness, what fools are they that are terrified without spirit, or word, or Epistle of others then blaspheming heretics, only upon lying improbabilities, yea impossibilities, affirming him to be already come, and now to continue above a thousand years? 

“Exorcist Priest” Vincent Lampert - Demonic Activity And His Heretical Beliefs

Sermons On Antichrist For Advent: Who Is Antichrist According To Vulgar Opinions Of Heretics

1. POINT. 

Who is Antichrist according to vulgar opinions of heretics. 

IT hath been oft showed that our Protestant Reformers have not settled belief in anything, nor in which be found any agreement even with their own brethren. Whereof Frusius in his Epigrams makes this pithy interrogation: 

Vna fides cum fit, quam nos docuere parentes, Cur nunc tot fidibus luditur vna fides? 

One holy faith our Godly Parents knew alone: why now a new belief forgets a part each one? 

It has been manifested manifold in other matters, and is now to be shown at this point. In which you must first be persuaded that among heretics, each one is termed Antichrist by whom they are condemned; as to Rebels, each king is a tyrant; to thieves each Judge a murderer; to the impious, each godly man an idiot. And so for this purpose which we have in hand, to the Brownists, the Puritans are soldiers of Antichrist; and to the Puritans, the profession now in England, is Antichristian; The Calvinists to the Lutherans, and the Lutherans to the Calvinists &c. This therefore is their first opinion, the one of themselves to the others of his brethren, co be Antichrist or Antichristian, when they iarr together. 

The second opinion of heretics would have the Turk to be ipsisimum Antichristum, the most assured Antichrist. In which were Bucer, Melanithon, and Fox. 

The third opinion of heretics is, that the Pope of Rome is Antichrist. So saith both Luther, and Calvin, never having any author of their opinion even among Heretics, before Peter John, who lived anno. 1194. as may appear in Guido Carmelit. To whom would fain also accord the whole group of Lutherans, and Calvinists, and other heretics at this time : but they can not resolve which Pope, or weather all ehre Popes together, they would have to be Antichrist; or from which of them they might begin to accompt the succession of Antichrist. In this they are long consulting, but can not as yet come to any determination. 

Some would have Gregorie the 7. who lived anno. 274. to be Antichrist so thought Francis Junius, and Downham, expressly affirming: Gregory the seventh was the first Pope who was openly acknowledged to 

be Antichrist. But this being said so openly known is contradicted first by Bullinger, supposing the fatal year of Antichrists beginning to have been 763. Secondly is contradicted by Fulke; Downham, and Willet specifying Boniface the anno. 607. to be Antichrist. 

Thirdly it is contradicted by Osiander affirming S. Augustin first preacher to the English to have subjected England to the lust of Roman Antichrist; who then anno 600. was S. Gregorie the great. But Whitaker impugn this, saying: Dicimus Gregorian Magnum fuiffe vltimum uerum dapium illius Ecclefie E- cótra. Bellar. Pifcopum.&c. Quienim fecuti funt veri fuerunt Antichrifti. Gregorie was a very honest man, but his immediate successors were Antichrists. This time, saith he, do we determine to be the beginning of Antichrist. Fourthly, all this is contradicted by Whitakar himself, agreeing with Beza, that Pope Leo anno. 440. was. Antichrist, and breathed the arrogance of the Anti-christian Roman Sea. Fifthly, all this is overthrown by Melancehon who resolutely affirmeth Zozim anno 420. to be the first Antichrist; as also by Naper defining the year to be anno: 313. Sixth, there formed Church of Transylvania (as it is termed by Hokenin his Ecclesiastical policy) overreach all these, and would have Antichrist to have first appeared anno. 200. Seventh, Sebastiane Francus disliking all these opinions would have the visible Church immediately after the apostles times, to have been suppressed by the Antichrist. 

Eightly, Beza thinking he might be as forward as the best, and affirm with as much reason as the former whatsoever he listed, concluded, in the very time of the Apostles, Antichrist to have begun. Which in plain and sincere terms is to affirm the whole profession of Papists to have begun in the Apostles. 

And for that cause the Centurists, and Calvin, although they do not term S. Peter Antichrist, yet as they might, they calumniate his person, and cavil with his profession, registering 16. notable defects in him, & his doctrine. By which it is demonstrated, that our Reformers have little interest in the Apostles whom they so endeavor to blemish. 

Ninth, all this clear doctrine could not hinder Couel, & Powel plainly to confess, that Protestants can not agree when this defection began of Antichrist; which truly is the truest opinion of all the former. 

Lastly notwithstanding all this uncertainty, repugnance,& impossibility, the late Calvinian Synod at Gap. anno. 1603, made an article of their profession of faith that the Pope without all doubt was Antichrist, Even Clement the eight whom S.Edwin Sands in his Relation assures to be a good man, a good prince and a good Prelate, and with whom, his Majesty denied not civil correspondence. 

But the said Sinodists, understanding that the King of FRANCE, took in evil part (as well he might) that his subjects should have any article of belief, that he was a slave of Antichrist: upon better deliberation, they revoked the said Article; as the Puritans do accuse others in England, now to fall from that opinion of the Popes being Antichrist, being (according their Imagination) a strange error & absurdity.

Therefore the fourth opinion of Heretics is, that Antichrist is not yet come, nor to conme until the Roman Empire be suppressed. So determine m Bullinger, Zanchius,Schelico, Frăciscus Lambertus, Vicelius, and divers others, as acknowledgeth D. Doue, saying: some Protestants make a doubt, whether Antichrist be yet revealed, or not. 

So that, as I said in the beginning, it now appeareth, that they can not certainly, either believe, or not believe whether the Pope be Antichrist, or who else is, or whether he be past, when he was or when he is to come. 

This may suffice for the opinion of Heretics: although this last opinion is but borrowed from us, after their despair to prove their damnable error that the Pope should be Antichrist.

Antichrist Sermons On Advent Sunday And In All The Time Of Advent.

WOLGEMUT, Michael 

Sermon of the Antichrist 

1493

THE SIXTH CHAP.  Of The Catholic Sermon Usually After The Credo. And Of Antichrist Of Whom Are Made Ordinarily The Sermons On Advent Sunday And In All The Time Of Advent. 

Saint Dionise immediately after the Ascension of Christ taught when the sermon was usually made in his time, saying: Osiulantibus omnibus mistica facrorum volumina, predicatio perficitur. When all have kissed the book after the reading of the Gospel, (which was during the saying Credo)  then the Sermon is made. To which S. Clement, and he also disciple to the Apostle, according in these words: Post lectionem legis & Prophetarum &c. After the lesson of the law, prophets, & the Gospel; alloquatur populum sermonibus exhortatorijs, let him exhort the people by sermon. 

Which being presupposed sufficient to contest the antiquity, and verity of this point: their remaineth only to deliver instead of a sermon, the wonted subject of sermons upon the precedent Gospel of Advent  Sunday. Which being of Antichrist, and nothing more needful to be known, or forewarned then the person, power, and perdition of so Capital enemy of God, god lines, and of all Gods servants; I intend to treat briefly, yet distinctly of what to him may principally belong, by distinct, and several points for more methods sake.

Fr. Fitzsimon 

1611

'Died Suddenly' and the Mark of the Beast

Are Tracking Implants the Mark of the Beast?

All You Need to Know About the Third Secret | Chris Ferrara