Michael Voris Is Mentioned By The Mother Of God At La Salette & Fatima!!!

Gary The Forerunner To The Antichrist

Michael Voris is mentioned by the Mother of God in Her messages. The Blessed Virgin Mother has told the world for the last 169 years about Michael Voris. Granted what the Mother of God has to say about Michael Gary Voris is not very good at all, as a matter of fact, when all is said and done, Gary will wish he never was born.

Look, none of you believe in a forerunner to the Antichrist. None. If any of you did then I certainly would have come across it, but I haven't.

Who is the forerunner to the Antichrist? Is he alive today?

At one time I thought that the Norway Mass Murderer Anders Behring Brievik was the forerunner to the Antichrist. But ABB is not a Roman Catholic, he may convert. ABB is incarcerated for another 15 years or so - he just may get an early release.

The reason for this blog is combat the error that many believe - that there is no forerunner to the Antichrist and the actual Antichrist is soon at hand. Those who believe in the Actual Antichrist manifesting himself soon are mostly protestant and worldly Catholics who are too lazy to look into the matter.

Our Lady of La Salette said that one day a forerunner to the Antichrist will rise up and gather an army of Nationalists from all Nations. This forerunner to the Antichrist will shed much blood:

“A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops gathered from several nations, will fight against the true Christ, the only Saviour of the world. He will shed much blood and will want to annihilate the worship of God to make himself be looked upon as a God. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879) 

Our Lady at La Salette does not mention who the forerunner will murder, but she does mention who will be martyred in her message at Fatima: the bishop dressed in white:

 “J.M.J.

The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fatima, on 13 July 1917.

I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.

After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: ‘Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.

Tuy-3-1-1944”.

The soldiers mentioned in the Fatima message are the same soldiers in the army of the forerunner  to the Antichrist mentioned in the La Salette Secret. These soldiers will kill the Fatima Pope and faithful who are making their way up a steep mountain. Because of the murder of the Fatima Pope and faithful, the man who leads this army will earn the title as the Forerunner to the Antichrist.

Who is the leader of the soldiers who will kill the Fatima Pope? The one in shades:

Gary The Forerunner to The Antichrist & Spiritual Director

Why pick on Voris? 

Can you name another soul who has such vitriolic hatred toward the SSPX as Michael Voris does? 

Can you name another soul who so fanatically idolizes Pope Francis as to give the Pope some God like status? 

On the one hand Voris verbally attacks and condemns men who are faithful to the Catholic Faith and on the other hand worships wicked and heretical Pope Francis. Can you not see how insane that is?

Completely insane.

Look, this is serious business. There is a forerunner to the Antichrist and he is probably alive today. It is the duty of any faithful Catholic to be on guard of such a one as the forerunner to the Antichrist. This man must be identified ahead of time before his public manifestation, because his public manifestation, I am afraid, will not be until he murders the Fatima Pope and faithful.

So call this a heads up.

If any one has a better candidate in mind please by all means share.

As for Gary, I still think that one day he will embarrass himself in idolizing wicked Pope Francis all the while attacking just about every Bishop and Cardinal out there. His embarrassment will come about after Pope Francis dies and another is elected in his place as Francis II - this second Francis will most likely be one of Voris' current targets. Many will mock Voris and ask him if he will now attack Francis II since he attacked him before he was elected pope.

Still Voris will gain power, a wicked power, a power given to him by Satan. The meaning behind the above photo of shade wearing Voris.......

Gary's future is soooooo bright he's gotta wear shades.....

"Fight, Children Of Light, You, The Few Who Can See. For Now Is The Time Of All Times, The End Of All Ends."

MARIA OF THE CROSS, 

Victim of Jesus nee MELANIE CALVAT, 

Shepherdess of La Salette

"I protest highly against a different text, which people may dare publish after my death. I protest once more against the very false statements of all those who dare say and write First that I embroidered the Secret; second, against those who state that the Queen Mother did not say to transmit the Secret to all her people." Melanie 

Funny.....Pope Francis Lands In Cuba & The Latest Stories On Church Militant Are All About The SSPX!!

Who has an axe to grid against the SSPX? Michael Voris does, the- ex-journalist Voris is afraid of covering the heretical and wicked Pope Francis, but Voris has no problem condemning the SSPX in these FIFTEEN attacks on the SSPX:

1. FBI—CATHOLI-SCHISM
2. CM EXCLUSIVE: A CANON LAWYER SPEAKS ON THE SSPX
3. ATHANASIUS CONTRA MUNDUM
4. Sheen Even Called It Schism
5. A Canonical History of the Lefebvrite Schism
6. Fr. John Emerson, FSSP: The Break With the SSPX
7. The Vortex—SSPX Sadness
8. The Vortex—Offensive to Go
9. The Vortex—Do NOT Go to Mass
10. The Vortex—SSPX Sunday Mass The Vortex—Schismatics Before God
11. SSPX Poachers 
12. ‘Have Nothing to Do With Them,’ Says Bishop About SSPX
13. Why I Left the SSPX
14. Why I Left the SSPX Milieu
15. SSPX Schism Turns Heretical

A little too much on the SSPX don't you think? Is Voris right about the SSPX? For a man who embraces the errors and heresies of Pope Francis,  his judgment is very flawed. You can't ignore the obvious heresies of Pope Francis without you yourself being a partaker of the Pope's heresies. He who touches pitch is defiled with it, is a lesson lost on Voris.

Voris is wrong about Pope Francis and he is wrong about the SSPX.

Will Team Gary step up the coverage on the Pope's visit to Cuba & US? Will CM's coverage of the Pope increase & coverage of the SSPX decease?

Will count the number of Church Militant stories about the Pope in the coming days. Rest assured that whatever scandal arises from the Pope in word or deed, Voris will completely and totally ignore all of them!

Most of the 15 attacks on the SSPX by Team Voris took place during the Novena to Our Lady Of La Salette. Think about that one for a minute. Michael Voris is at war with the SSPX and Voris is at war with the Mother of God. Voris was deliberately thumbing his nose at Our Lady of La Salette.

As you can gather all 15 of the attacks made on the SSPX where written and produced ahead of time. Probably took many days of preparation to put all these attacks together on the SSPX. Voris had help from many FSSP priests as well.

It is said that Voris took a 'retreat' on the very day when Pope Francis announced that the SSPX can hear confessions during the year of Mercy, this Papal action put Voris in to such a shock that he spent his entire retreat writing the attacks on the SSPX and made the decision to go on the offensive.

Voris will become very powerful in the years to come...but he will eventually fall.

What Do Sedevacantists & Michael Voris Have In Common? Sedevacantists & Michael Voris Will Not Engage In Public Criticism Of The Pope! But Will Attack Bishops!

 Birds of a Feather....

What do Sedevacantists & Michael Voris have in common?

They will never criticize the Pope! Never!

All Sedevacantists hold the papacy in such high esteem that they will never ever utter one bad word about the pope - NEVER!

You could say that Sedevacantists love the papacy so much that its almost tantamount to worship.

Think about this - All Sedevacantists believe that the popes can not err or commit sin in matters of faith. For if a pope were to sin in matters of faith then that would prove that that "pope" was not a pope.

This is why Sedevacantists will never mock, ridicule or criticize any Pope prior to John XXIII.

According to Sedevacantists the last sinless, immaculate and stainless pope was Pius XII.

But you say that Sedevacantists are the worst ever in mocking and ridiculing the popes! True! But they only mock and ridicule the last six popes - John XXIII, Paul XI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI & Francis. According to Sedevacantists these men all sin in matters of faith and therefore were not Catholics and therefore were not popes!

You see when a man becomes pope he is blessed with supper powers that keep him from committing any error or any sins! According to Sedevacantists Popes are the first Supermen!  Sedevacantists would even go so far to say that once a man is elected pope he never, ever has to go to confession because that man is protected from on high never to sin or cause any scandal to any one! NEVER!

But according to Sedevacantists it is clear that John XXIII, Paul XI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI & Francis caused scandals in matters of faith and morals and therefore were not popes!

So according to  Sedevacantists it's OK to mock, ridicule John XXIII, Paul XI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI & Francis because they are not popes and are nothing but bishops! And bishops are fair game!

A pope is pure and immaculate never stained by sin of any kind, not stained by in sin in thought, word or deed! Not stained by mortal sins or even venial sins!

According to Sedevacantists one can say that the men once that they are elected pope are like Blessed Virgin Mother in the womb of St Anne - Immaculate & free from the stain of original sin. The Popes are protected in the womb of the Church - nothing can hurt them! And the popes in the womb of the Church can do no harm!

Enter Michael Voris ChurchMilitant.TV Will Not Engage in Public Criticism of the Pope

What to say about Voris' take on the Pope....he, like the Sedevacantists dare not attack the pope. Sedevacantists & Voris both believe that the pope is incapable of committing sin in thought word or deed and both Voris & Sedevacantists believe that popes can not cause any scandal to anyone EVER!

No, Voris will not attack Pope Francis but he will go after Bishops.

Where is all this going? Its going the way of Sedevacantistm!

Voris will go the way of Sedevacantism soon enough - when the antic of Francis become too much to bear. When it becomes so blatantly obvious that Pope Francis is a heretic, Voris will have to say something, even to the point of criticizing Pope Francis, Voris will have to take the road of Sedevacantists and declare that Pope Francis is not a true pope and he is nothing but a bishop and according to the reasoning of Voris Francis must be attacked! Because Francis is nothing but a bishop.

So two the camps of Sedevacantists & Voris both place the papacy on a pedestal, which will soon be knocked over.

Originally Published 22 Mar. 2014

Michael Voris Using Sermons Of Fr. Philip Wolfe, FSSP To Falsely Accuse The SSPX Of Schism!! Will FSSP Apologize To The SSPX?

The FSSP runs the Mater Dei Latin Mass Parish in Irving, Texas  This parish is the where all of Voris' attacks on the SSPX originate. The executive producer of Church Militant Terry Carroll attends Mass at this FSSP chapel

Fr. Philip Wolfe, FSSP has a hatred for the SSPX and he feeds his hatred to Michael Voris in the form of sermons.

The Vortex that uses the Sermon of a FSSP priest to attack the SSPX:

THE VORTEX—SCHISMATICS BEFORE GOD

At first some said that Voris plagiarized portions of this Vortex - but later a notification was sent out stating:

Portions of this script were taken with permission from this sermon.

The  plagiarizing is not the issues. The issue is the source of the material used by Michael Voris in attacking the SSPX. And that source is Fr. Philip Wolfe, FSSP.

So the FSSP is attacking the SSPX.

This attack by the FSSP is uncalled for.

May the FSSP be punished in the days to come leading up to the Synod.

Remember Voris Is The Same Man Who Thinks Russia Has Been Consecrated To The Immaculate Heart Of Mary

Has Russia been consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary?

Persecution: A Blessing in Disguise? by Michael Lofton August 12, 2015.

The answer from the Church_Militant_Moderator is YES! The Consecration to the Immaculate of Mary has been done!

This is further evidence that Gary Voris and crew are heretics and Gary is the forerunner to the Antichrist: Along with Voris' defense of wicked Pope Francis, Voris' persecution of the SSPX and those laity who attend the SSPX masses we can know add that Voris believes that the Consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary has been done!

What new folly will Church Militant.Com embrace? Stay tuned.

Persecution: A Blessing in Disguise?

Church_Militant_Moderator: 
EWTN gives a good response to this general question "Has Russia been consecrated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary" https://www.ewtn.com/expert/an... A good historical dateline is provided there.

Specifically, the Church has said that the consecration has been done and Sister Lucy appears to have confirmed this or, at least, said the consecration done has been "accepted" by Heaven. Therefore, to continue to "advocate" contrary to what the Church says in this regard is to sow division and distrust of the Church and, in effect, place Mary in opposition to the Vicar(s) of Christ.

It is inconceivable that Our Lady would ask that Catholics listen to her and judge the popes and bishops as disobedient liars for not having obeyed her, but this is the practical effect of individuals and movements organized around "The Church has not obeyed Our Lady and is lying to us that they have."

Think about it. Would Our Lady place herself above the Vicar of Christ and expect Catholics to obey her and ignore the Church? Even if it is true that popes and bishops have "disobeyed" the direct request of Our Lady (and I propose this for the sake of argument only) there is no way that Our Lady would encourage people, practically, to separate themselves from "submission to the Roman Pontiff" (part of the canonical definition of schism) and to submit to her instead. If one starts to follow Our Lady as "pope in practice," then we cease to follow the visible Church and the Vicar of Christ and create a kind of "Marian Catholic Church" in opposition to the visible "Roman Catholic Church."

Since CM does, in fact, "submit to the Roman Pontiff" and the authority of the Church, and since the Church has said that the consecration has been done, who are we (or anyone else) to say that it has not? What fruits can come from continuing to insist that the consecration has not been done beyond increased separation of Catholics from the Chair of Peter?

The Church says the consecration has been done. Sister Lucy confirmed that it has been done. Those who say it has not are already or well on their way into the dark land of schism. It is inconceivable to us that Our Lady would smile on those who have organized their lives and apostolates around "The Church has not obeyed Our Lady and is lying to us. Listen to Our Lady and ignore the Church." Church_Militant_Moderator

GARY VORIS: "Every Single SSPX Priest And Bishop Is Committing A Mortal Sin When He Offers Mass!"

Gary The Forerunner To The Antichrist

"A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops drawn from many nations, will wage war against the true Christ, sole Savior of the world; he will shed much blood and will seek to annihilate the cult of God so as to be regarded as a god." Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)

Notice that Gary the forerunner to the Antichrist is forced to attack the SSPX during the Novena to Our Lady of La Salette.

Should be further evidence that Gary Voris is the forerunner to the Antichrist spoken of by Our Lady at La Salette.

Gary will one day murder the Fatima Pope because the Fatima Pope will come from the SSPX. Gary will then earn the title of forerunner to the Antichrist.

Read more from Gary:

every single SSPX priest and bishop is committing a mortal sin when he offers Mass.

Voris will one day be embarrassed by the actions of Pope Francis and will hide on a mountain top some day.

LOL! Michael Matt Still Pleading "Can't We All Just Get Along" And The Very Next Day Voris Attacks The SSPX Again......Matt & Voris Beating A Dead Horse!

Voris' dead horse is SSPX is in Schism

Matt's dead horse is can't we all just get along?

Please Matt take a side. No time for fence sitting.

Either Voris & the FSSP is right and the SSPX is wrong

or

SSPX is right and Voris FSSP & their ilk are wrong.

Can't have it both ways Matt.

Here watch Matt do his Rodney King impersonation:

Then hop on over the Church Militant and watch the latest from Gary the forerunner to the Antichrist!

Bishop Morlino Apologizes To SSPX!!! Will Gary The Forerunner To The Antichrist Apologize To The SSPX As Well?

Don't hold your breath...

Hey Clueless Mike Voris! That Someone Is POPE FRANCIS! Someone Released This Behind The Bishops’ Backs! Someone Had To Decide What Was Going Into It! Someone Had To Look It Over! Someone Had To Give The Go-Ahead To Push Send!

Make A Mess In The Church

Voris, what a clueless idiot you are! Here are pictures of the man responsible for the mess! His Name Is POPE FRANCIS!

Either Voris can't put two and two together or he is possessed! There is no excuse to ignore the obvious unless you're under some spell or something.......

Here you clueless idiot are pictures of the guy RESPONSIBLE!!!

THE VORTEX Document-Gate 

October 16, 2014

Hello, everyone, and welcome to The Vortex, where lies and falsehoods are trapped and exposed. I’m Michael Voris coming to you from Rome reporting on the Extraordinary Synod on the Family.

So the dust is beginning to settle—a little—over the infamous document released by the Vatican Press Office on Monday—the one that says the Church is going to be changing its teachings on homosexuality and get rid of the horrible reality of adultery, letting anyone who wants to approach for Holy Communion do so.

Well, it doesn’t actually say that, but that’s how it was reported—and from the perspective of reporters in the press room, it might as well have said that. The language was so confusing and so vague and so unCatholic, that this time, no one can blame the media for spinning something that wasn’t served up to them on a silver platter.

Time and again, the cardinals and bishops present at the press briefing were given an opportunity to explicitly repeat Church teaching loud and clear—and every time, they punted.

So when the press asks you, for example, “Please explain what you mean by saying that marriage and same-sex unions cannot be considered on the same footing” (to quote the document)—sounding like there is another footing on which same-sex marriage can be considered—and your only answer is “We must love and respect everyone, and everyone has a dignity from God and we should love and respect everyone and everyone should love and respect each other and not discriminate and everyone should love and respect everyone. . . .” Frankly, what in Hades type of impression do you expect a reporter to walk away with?

Can anyone really be surprised that a message went out around the world in less than three hours, and nearly obliterated 2000 years of Church teaching in the speed of a tweet? This is why this whole question of the document—called the Relatio—needs to be looked at very seriously—not the document itself, that’s already been done—but the circumstances surrounding the document.

First of all, in Tuesday’s press briefing, Durban, South African Cardinal Napier revealed to the assembled journalists that the press had seen the document before the bishops had actually seen it. That simple admission reveals quite a lot. It means that someone released this behind the bishops’ backs. Someone had to type it up, someone had to decide what was going into it, someone had to look it over, someone had to give the go-ahead to push send, and someone had to push the print button.

In short, a document came out that stunned many of the bishops. Only after looking it over for the first time did some bishops begin to make their justifiable anger known— Cardinal Raymond Burke, for one.

Some bishops went on record as saying that various things contained in the document were not representative of what had been discussed or presented. Again, Cardinal Napier said some things in the document had barely come up at all, or had only been mentioned once or twice, yet there they were, on full display for the whole world as though they were reflective of the minds of the fathers of the synod.

The section on homosexuality—one of the most controversial because of its overturning and contradicting of Church teaching—looks like it was inserted by just one man, Archbishop Bruno Forte, the same archbishop who floored our question on Monday about what specific gifts the synod thought flowed directly from the intrinsically disordered homosexual orientation.

He takes personal ownership of not just the concept, but the actual authorship—which shouldn’t be surprising because Cardinal Peter Erdo publicly stated as much when he said to let the man who wrote it explain it.

Now, when you ask at the press briefings, who was the person or persons who collected the information, wrote the document, approved the document, published the document, and distributed it to journalists before the bishops got a chance to look at it—you get no answer.

Vatican officials Fr. Frederico Lombardi and Fr. Thomas Rosica merely answer that the document came from “the process”—no names, no information, not a shred of transparency.

And this is causing quite a few people on the ground here to ask: Was this all planned? Was the reaction of the worldwide press exactly what was hoped for? Was this in short an official “leak” with the expectation that the world media would go bananas and dutifully report all this exactly as they did—as it would be expected they would?

This is why this document carries with it a double poison: the obvious one of the repulsive non-Catholic content, but the less obvious but more important one of a well thought-out, clandestine plan to use the world media to help grease the skids and prepare people’s minds and create an expectation that the Church is now going to welcome gays. And it is this reality that makes this whole Church-of-Nice babbling that it’s only a “working document,” “nothing is going to change in Church teaching” so farcical and naïve.

Father Robert Baron wrote a piece telling everyone to calm down—nothing to see here, folks; it’s just like making sausage—wait till it’s done.

It is done, Fr. Barron—at least the damage—and that’s what those behind all this cloak of secrecy wanted done: a worldwide perception and expectation that the Church has changed its teaching. It doesn’t matter if it doesn’t actually change it or not—in the mind of the man on the street, it has.

Even Cardinal Napier said that because of the release of the document, with its troublesome language coupled with the global media frenzy, that the Church was now digging out of a hole.

Of course, missing this point entirely, Fr. Barron’s dutiful clones on the blogs quickly followed suit, talking about how great Fr. Barron’s insights are and how we have to all just calm down—totally missing the point that it doesn’t really matter what the final document says which will be produced when all this is over—what matters is the now irredeemable position the Church has been placed in.

Cardinal Timothy Dolan—“Cardinal Bravo”—who has perhaps more than any other prelate contributed to the idea that the Church embraces homosexuality—echoed all these same thoughts when he said, “Calm down; it’s just a working document; nothing’s changing.”

It already has changed. Can’t these people see this? Too late. This is why Cardinal Burke has gone on public record and said the Pope himself must clarify this mess and make very clear very loudly that no Church teaching has changed.

How did this happen? Who was responsible? Even if there was no plan, whoever was involved in this should be fired and dragged through the streets for their sheer idiocy. Imagine putting a “working document” into the hands of secular journalists that says the Church should “value” the homosexual orientation, that homosexuals as homosexuals bring certain gifts and qualities to the Church, and that the Church should look for the good in their sin. What could possibly go wrong?

And to top it all off, the Church of Nice crowd on the blogs—you know, the reasonable, well-measured, serene ones, and the ones wearing Cardinal’s robes—have completely missed the second point.

What prelate of the Church actually brings up these kinds of topics for discussion in the first place? They are settled doctrine. Homosexuality is intrinsically disordered and homosexual acts are objectively evil. Period. How is the Church ever helped by sin?

Same question is asked about committing sacrilege with the Eucharist by distributing OurLord’s Body and Blood to those unworthy. And before the Church of Nice asks the pointless question “Well, who is worthy?” St. Paul gives the answer in his letter to the Corinthians.

Cardinal Burke perhaps summed up this whole mess best of all: It’s UN-Catholic, he said, UN-Catholic—and that’s why Catholics who defend it, or blow it off, or downplay it don’t understand the real stakes here.

Stay tuned for our continuing reports from the Synod on the Family and the increasing fall-out.

Reporting to you from The Vatican just outside St. Peter’s Square, this is Michael Voris for Church Militant.TV News. GOD LOVE YOU.

I’m Michael Voris

PAY ATTENTION!!!

Demon Pazuzu 

“In the year 1864, Lucifer together with a large number of demons will be unloosed from hell; they will put an end to faith little by little, even in those dedicated to God. They will blind them in such a way, that, unless they are blessed with a special grace, these people will take on the spirit of these angels of hell; several religious institutions will lose all faith and will lose many souls.Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)  

Several will abandon the faith, and a great number of priests and members of religious orders will break away from the true religion; among these people there will even be bishops. Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879) 

"Francis / Bishop of Rome."

Francis The Destroyer

For In Those Days Jesus Christ Will Send Them Not A True Pastor, But A Destroyer ~ St. Francis

Originally Published  16 October 2014

Michael Voris' New Hair Care Products Fiasco!