Church_Militant_Moderator Hatred For The SSPX #4
I dreamed of this one here as Lord and huntsman,
pursing the wolf and the cubs up the mountain
(which blocks the sight of Lucca from the Pisans).
with skinny bitches, well trained and obedient;
he had out in front as leaders of the pack
Gualandi with Sismondi and Lanfranchi.
A short run, and the father with his sons
seemed to grow tired, and then I thought I saw
long fangs sunk deep into their sides, ripped open.
"A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops drawn from many nations, will wage war against the true Christ, sole Savior of the world; he will shed much blood and will seek to annihilate the cult of God so as to be regarded as a god." Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fatima, on 13 July 1917.
I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.
There will be a forerunner to the Antichrist.After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: ‘Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.Tuy-3-1-1944”.
Who is he?
Why does he war against the Church?
How will he earn his title?
The forerunner to the Antichrist is Gary Michael Voris or better known as Gary.
Yes, the forerunner to the Antichrist is named Gary. That name in it self is a cosmic joke.
Gary wars against the Church because of his pride.
Gary will earn his title of forerunner to the Antichrist because he will kill the Fatima Pope and the faithful.
Who is the Fatima Pope? Probably a Priest from the SSPX.
This is the reason Gary will kill the Fatima Pope out of his hatred for the SSPX.
Here is documentation (for future generations) of the hatred for the SSPX by Gary and crew:
‘Have Nothing to Do With Them,’ Says Bishop About SSPX Bishop Morlino has issued a warning about the SSPX
why aren't the clergy as vociferous and assertive about condemning abortion as they are about faithful Catholics? I accept the criticism labelled against the sspx but I find it distasteful that more time tends to be devoted to those who are fellow brothers and sisters in Christ professing absolute values in accordance with Christ's teachings yet liberal sections of the Church receive disproportionate or no criticism. I have come across websites who label themselves Catholic yet promote the right to choose abortion or demand women priests, same sex marriage ceremonies to take place in Churches etc where is the condemnation of these heretics? The liberal conservative schism is already happening whether the Vatican like it or not and because the curia is largely operated by liberal relativists who want a charismatic ala carte religion emphasising non absolutes contrary to the teachings of Christ. I recognise that one should love the sinner and not the sin, and as a perpetual sinner myself by virtue of my fallibility as a human being I believe that to be a noble position but what seems to be lost is the issue of the dichotomy between sin and sinner. The Church seems to promote a variant of tolerance forgetting that tolerance by definition requires dislike of the object itself. Moreover, when Jesus healed sinners he disnt stop there but cried " go sin no more", that part of the narrative seems to be conveniently forgotten. We seem to have a Church that promotes the reception of the sacraments absent meaning and grace. We have silence in the Church when liberal "catholic" ( lower case emphasised) politicians and advocates proudly support heinous acts abortion without sanction in the form of ex communication from the Church...why? because the hierarchy are invariably a pool of libertarians that have no stomach to fight for what is right but rather promote those causes by omission and silence in the meantime 3300 little souls die daily. How many Bishops have criticised Amnesty International and their pro abortion stance which changed since 2007 ( prior to that they were still guilty by omission and sitting on the fence neutral policy. Amnesty's official policy is that they "do not promote abortion as a universal right" but "support the decriminalisation of abortion....The Church issued a lukewarm condemnation centrally from the Vatican yet where is the real opposition? Yet, the hierarchy have no problem lambasting certain traditionalist Catholics ( I accept the criticism labelled against the sspx and its condemnation of V2)? In my own jurisdiction, Ireland , we have an ineffective poor leadership that has allowed abortion, soon to be on demand in my opinion, to prevail while idiotic heretical politicians who supported the policy to freely receive communion. What we need is a man of courage and integrity to inherit the Petrine legacy which is founded on martyrdom. These days many modern clergymen wouldn't like their personality criticised let alone give their lives for Christ ( ps I am not advocating violence but rather a return to passion the same demonstrated by Christ preceding his crucifixion.
Church_Militant_Moderator Mod To wayne costello
Yes, bishops should be addressing these other important issues, and they are not. But that doesn't mean it is wrong to address an issue as important as schism, which is the devil's particular temptation for the pious.
Many souls are already lost to sins of the flesh. It is important for bishops to address issues like the SSPX because they often tempt "the best and the brightest" to leave the Church, weakening the Church Militant in the battle against evil.
The pious are deceived by schism and false apparitions / private revelations. This is why these apparently smaller issues get the attention of bishops.
wayne costello To Church_Militant_Moderator
I never said it was wrong...I said they don't approach these issues with same vociferousness and veracity. As for the SSPX tempting the faithful away is analogous to blaming the mistress for the infidelity instead of the state of the marriage...a happy marriage means no one will leave...tempted perhaps but not leave. The Church is weak and has become obsessed with popularity. I would much prefer a small but devoted Church that stood for something rather than a popular one that stood for nothing. The Prussian KIng Frederick II once remarked " to stand for everything mean to stand for nothing" which seems to be the adopted stance of the Church on social and moral issues. I accept there must be a Church to survive in the first place to promote righteousness but by the same token tiny Innocents lost to abortion cannot even be determined "brightest and best " as they aren't given the chance to develop and exit the womb in one piece.. The pious are deceived by a lot including their own ego and pride . The distortion of the truth and morality inherent in natural law and justice discoverable only through reason as espoused by a great father of the Church Tomas Aquinas is not being taught in schools nor the topic of sermons. Where is the catechism? we only read about diluted distorted versions through the prism of a politically correct Church . The Church will survive even if it is whittled down to a few devotees.. in the same way it started with Christ and the apostles but in that it was its purest.....little fetus wont have the opportunity to have their voice heard let alone discuss or defend against a schism.
The SSPX is in communion with Rome. As a member of this society, I can assure you, that we are not sedevancantists, but we do not accept the V II. Rumor has it that we are schismatics, but unlike the sedevancantists, Mons.Fellay is seeking to build better relationships with Rome, so he's really doing something about it. the Pope is currently dealing with these matters.
Church_Militant_Moderator Mod To Consuelo
If the SSPX is in communion with Rome, they sure have an odd way of showing it! No, they are not sedevacantists in principle, but they are in practice.
"The SSPX, for all their many good qualities, are not faithful Roman Catholics because communion with the Chair of Peter is a constitutive part of Roman Catholicism, something the SSPX accepts in principle but rejects in practice. They have "no canonical status," "no legitimate ministry," are "invited to rediscover the path to full communion," have no faculties from any bishop, are not part of the divinely ordained hierarchical structure of the Church, and all their priests are suspended a divinis. No individual or group can seriously claim to be Catholic and have all this true of themselves."