Church_Militant_Moderator Hatred For The SSPX #2
I dreamed of this one here as Lord and huntsman,
pursing the wolf and the cubs up the mountain
(which blocks the sight of Lucca from the Pisans).
with skinny bitches, well trained and obedient;
he had out in front as leaders of the pack
Gualandi with Sismondi and Lanfranchi.
A short run, and the father with his sons
seemed to grow tired, and then I thought I saw
long fangs sunk deep into their sides, ripped open.
"A forerunner of the Antichrist, with his troops drawn from many nations, will wage war against the true Christ, sole Savior of the world; he will shed much blood and will seek to annihilate the cult of God so as to be regarded as a god." Our Lady of La Salette 19 Sept. 1846 (Published by Mélanie 1879)
The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fatima, on 13 July 1917.
I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.
There will be a forerunner to the Antichrist.After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: ‘Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.Tuy-3-1-1944”.
Who is he?
Why does he war against the Church?
How will he earn his title?
The forerunner to the Antichrist is Gary Michael Voris or better known as Gary.
Yes, the forerunner to the Antichrist is named Gary. That name in it self is a cosmic joke.
Gary wars against the Church because of his pride.
Gary will earn his title of forerunner to the Antichrist because he will kill the Fatima Pope and the faithful.
Who is the Fatima Pope? Probably a Priest from the SSPX.
This is the reason Gary will kill the Fatima Pope out of his hatred for the SSPX.
Here is documentation (for future generations) of the hatred for the SSPX by Gary and crew:
‘Have Nothing to Do With Them,’ Says Bishop About SSPX Bishop Morlino has issued a warning about the SSPX
First of all, I am not a member of an SSPX congregation, I have never attended any of their servces, and I don't personally know anyone connected with them. My entire knowledge of them is based on what I have read and heard on the internet from all perspectives.
Bishop Morlino's point 1) the Legislator (the Pope) and the bishops with him don't think there is a state of emergency, strictly speaking, begs the question.
The whole SSPX issue hinges on the state of emergency argument put forward by AB Lefebvre and based on canon law 1323:4f : "No one is liable to a penalty who, when violating a law or precept: 4ƒ acted under the compulsion of grave fear, even if only relative, or by reason of necessity or grave inconvenience, unless, however, the act is intrinsically evil or tends to be harmful to souls."
Yes, SSPX appear, prima facie, to be in schism, but this judgement would be nullified if Lefebvre's claims were vindicated in time. I think we are all still too close in time to the fateful events in question to call it and I think that is why the authorities in Rome, especially under BXVI, have not moved against them in any decisive way but on the contrary, have opened channels of rapprochement. Pope Francis continues with the same policy.
Let us consider the hypocrisy of a situation where there are certain prelates who are formally submitted to the Pope and the Magisterium, and yet, in their daily words and deeds they are heretics and schismatics and give grave scandal. CM is tireless in documenting their antics and so we don't need to name any names here. On the other hand, AB Lefebvre was probably the most theologically, morally and liturgically orthodox prelate of the second half of the 20th century, yet on some (disputed) legal technicalities he is to be condemned as a schismatic? There is something not quite right about this state of affairs.
However, it's all way above my pay grade and I am very lucky to be able to attend a diocesan Latin mass run by very fine, orthodox priests of FSSP, but a part of me has a terrible sense of foreboding about the near and middle future as things continue to spiral further away from orthodoxy in the main body of the Church. Will it eventually turn out that AB Lefebvre was the canary in the mineshaft?
Church_Militant_Moderator Mod to Sancho Panza
Conflicting interpretations of Canon Law are resolved by the judgement of the Supreme Legislator, from whose decisions there is no appeal. If the Supreme Legislator judges that there is not a state of emergency as envisioned by Canon Law, then there is no state of emergency! The Supreme Legislator is not bound by Canon Law, else it would be possible to appeal his decisions.
The highly self-serving interpretations and applications of Canon Law by the Society allow one to justify almost any action whatsoever short of intrinsic evil by appeal to little more than "I thought it was the right thing to do." Subjective factors may, indeed, mitigate personal culpability and, therefore, application of certain penalties, but they cannot mitigate the requirement to submit to the decisions of the Supreme Legislator and those to whom he delegates his authority.
The SSPX have consistently refused the most generous and magnanimous invitations from the Church to reconcile and place themselves under the authority of the Vicar of Christ, rejecting his dogmatically defined “full power of shepherding, ruling and governing the universal Church,” a power "ordinary and immediate over all the churches and over each and every member of the faithful" ( see our FAQ http://www.churchmilitant.com/... )
There is much in the Society's critique of the crisis in the Church that has already been vindicated. What can never be vindicated is their decision to refuse to submit to the Roman Pontiff, the very essence of the canonical definition of schism. Even if Archbishop Lefebvre was the "canary in the mineshaft," the decision to break communion with the Church as response is sinful and evil. Have you ever read some of his actual words about the Church and schism? They are shocking, even for a "canary"! (See http://www.churchmilitant.tv/f... )